Tamara Alenezi · Structural LinkedIn

Home / Calculations / 06

Calculations · 06 · Practice

Integrated design & decisions

How a four-discipline student firm turned a new site, three added stories and an owner's mass-timber requirement into a traceable set of engineering decisions, each backed by a calculation.

Thesis sheetsS.1 references · AP.1 · all title blocks
CoursesAE 372 · AE 441 · AE 481W · AE 482
TeamAnchor Point Engineering
STEP 1

One building, four disciplines

The capstone (AE 481W / AE 482) runs like a small firm. Every sheet's title block names the discipline team, with the sheet's author in bold.

DisciplineTeamStructural sheet ownership
StructuralTamara Alenezi · Nicholas DeMarco · Kevin Regep · Kohshin NomaTamara: enclosure connections, C&C, assemblies, drift (S.3.1–S.3.3, AP.1–AP.6)
K. Noma: loads, gravity system, CLT, modeling (S.1–S.4)
K. Regep: foundations, GFRC façade, spandrel torsion
Lighting / ElectricalWhitney Felix—
MechanicalKohl Lindaman—
ConstructionLuca Ash · Akshaye Swamy—
STEP 2

What drove the design

  • New site: relocation to Boca Raton, FL, with 180 mph wind (Risk Category III, Exposure C), higher humidity, more thermal demand and the Florida Building Code 2023.
  • Three added stories: more gravity load, more equipment load, more drift.
  • Owner requirement: mandatory use of mass timber.
  • Sustainability target: reduce embodied carbon by at least 30%.
  • Enclosure goals: modular, quick-to-install and repairable façades, and a higher level of aesthetics than plain brick.
STEP 3

Decision log

Every major choice on the sheets is backed by a comparison or a check:

DecisionOptions consideredBasisOutcome
Floor systemConcrete–steel composite · CLT non-composite · CLT compositeDeflection & strength DCRs, owner requirementCLT composite, ≈ 98% flexural DCR. Calc
Topping thickness2″ vs 3″ NWCVibration and deflection limits for CLT3″. Calc
Fire protectionApplied fireproofing vs inherent charringPredictability, no applied material, exposed timberInherent charring, 2-hr residual section passes. Calc
Zone 3 framingWide-flange beams vs open-web joistsRevised architectural program, low loads, efficiencyJoists. Members per bay ≈ 3 → 2.5. Calc
Mech/elec live loadCode minimum vs uniform 100 psfMore equipment demand from the added stories100 psf, conservative. Table
Façade systemsBrick (original) vs rainscreen panels, unitized curtain wall, punched windowsCoastal wind, moisture, modularity, aesthetics, thermalThree-system enclosure. Calc
Glazing fillAir vs argon IGUNFRC-based scoringArgon (40 vs 31). Calc
Spandrel restraintNo kickers vs kickersDG 9 rotation ≤ 0.5°Kickers @ 8 ft, θ = 0.067°. Calc
Drift accommodationPer-system joint strategiesh/600 and h/400 under D + 0.7WAll three feasible. Calc
STEP 4

Where disciplines meet

The most useful engineering on the sheets happens where one person's output becomes someone else's input:

  • Enclosure → structure: Tamara's assembly weights (294.61 and 230.83 plf) are the façade line loads on the gravity loading diagrams.
  • Structure → enclosure: interstory drift sets the joint and anchor movement each façade system has to allow.
  • Architecture → torsion: the 2″ slab-edge clearance is part of the 6.5″ eccentricity that twists the spandrel.
  • Mechanical → structure: extra equipment demand sets the 100 psf mechanical room live load.
  • Construction → structure: repeating bays and minimal angled framing for fabrication, erection and economy of scale. Construction vibration and noise limits (OSHA) are part of the foundation review.
STEP 5

Codes & references used

ReferenceUsed for
ASCE 7-22Load combinations (Ch. 2), dead and live loads (Ch. 3–4), seismic and site class (Ch. 11, 12, 20), wind parameters (Ch. 26), components & cladding (Ch. 30)
IBC 2021 / FBC 2023Heights and areas, construction type, structural design, wood, exterior walls, foundation testing and deep foundations
AISC 360-22 and Design Guides 9, 11, 22, 37Steel design, torsion, vibration, façade attachments, hybrid steel frames with wood floors
NDS 2018CLT design values (Ch. 10) and fire design / char depth (Ch. 16)
ACI 318-19 · ACI 336.1-24Concrete design · drilled shaft construction
U.S. CLT Handbook · Mass Timber Floor Vibration DGShear analogy, vibration-controlled span, fire · stiffness modifiers for FE models
ASTM D1143 / D3966 · ASCE 24-24 · ASTM E1996Pile load tests · flood-resistant design · hurricane impact resistance
STEP 6

The coursework behind it

AE 372 (project organization, contracts, estimating, scheduling) and AE 441 (life-cycle economics) are behind the cost and constructability sides of these decisions. Organizational Behavior & Design, listed on her résumé, is behind the teamwork. The capstone sequence AE 481W / AE 482 is where it all comes together.